GEO report · public sharing
serpstat.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
85.9
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
93/100
Grade A
Your AI visibility
84/100
Grade B
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Sitemap is missing lastmod dates — search engines use them to prioritize recrawling of updated content
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
100
- llms.txt follows the llmstxt.org spec ✓
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
65
No issues found ✓
📝 Basic Page Signals
100
No issues found ✓
💬 Content Citability
70
- Low factual density — AI more often cites pages with numbers, prices, years
- Only 0/4 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
80
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
🔒 Security
100
No issues found ✓
⚡ Performance
85
- INP 271ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms — og STIGENDE fra 410ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
62
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
80
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
77
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (2 af 20 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →