GEO report · public sharing
surferseo.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
84.6
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
87/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
76/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
90
No issues found ✓
📝 Basic Page Signals
90
- Meta description length: 179 characters (optimal: 25-160)
💬 Content Citability
85
- Only 0/17 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
65
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
- No Wikidata entry — less entity recognition in AI
🔒 Security
75
- Missing X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header
- Missing X-Frame-Options header
⚡ Performance
70
- INP 236ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms
- LCP 2761ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms — og STIGENDE fra 1876ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 59 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
88
No issues found ✓
🎯 Platform Optimization
100
No issues found ✓
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
80
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
90
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →