GEO report · public sharing
atlascopcogroup.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-02 · Back to the benchmark
69.7
/100
Grade: D
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
72/100
Grade C
Your AI visibility
69/100
Grade D
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Din robots.txt har en 'Crawl-delay'-linje — den bremser AI-crawlere (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot m.fl.) og skader din AI-synlighed. Google ignorerer den alligevel; fjern linjen.
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
0
- No JSON-LD structured data found
📝 Basic Page Signals
70
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- Title length: 4 characters (optimal: 10-70)
💬 Content Citability
85
- Only 0/35 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
65
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
- No Wikidata entry — less entity recognition in AI
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
32
- CLS 0.27 (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for høj; Googles grænse er 0.1 — og STIGENDE fra 0.13 over 25 uger
- INP 201ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms
- LCP 4018ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms — og STIGENDE fra 2819ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
75
No issues found ✓
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
30
- Missing Organization/LocalBusiness schema — most important for AI entity recognition
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
75
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 2 af 65 sætninger indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →