GEO report · public sharing
sallinggroup.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
62.8
/100
Grade: D
Average — AI search engines can read parts of the site, but important signals are missing. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Average — AI search engines can read parts of the site, but important signals are missing. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
69/100
Grade D
Your AI visibility
59/100
Grade F
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
0
- No JSON-LD structured data found
📝 Basic Page Signals
32
- No H1 heading found — H1 is critical for AI entity recognition
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- No canonical tag found — tells search engines and AI which version of the page is the right one
- Manglende Open Graph / Social Sharing tags — AI-crawlere (Perplexity, ChatGPT plugins) bruger og:title og og:description til entitetsgenkendelse og uddrag. Mangler: Mangler og:image meta-tag, Mangler twitter:card/twitter:title meta-tags
💬 Content Citability
55
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 0/12 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
- Few highlighted key terms — bold text guides AI attention
🏷️ Brand Entity
65
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
- No Wikidata entry — less entity recognition in AI
🔒 Security
60
- Missing X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header
- Missing X-Frame-Options header
- Missing Strict-Transport-Security header (HSTS) — recommended for AI crawlers
⚡ Performance
100
No issues found ✓
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 299 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
62
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
65
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Few question-answer patterns — AI often cites direct answers
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
30
- Missing Organization/LocalBusiness schema — most important for AI entity recognition
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
70
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (5 af 43 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- 2 sætninger med vagt superlativ-sprog uden belæg. Overvej at tilføje konkrete tal som understøttelse
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →