GEO report · public sharing
moz.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
82.4
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
86/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
78/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Din robots.txt har en 'Crawl-delay'-linje — den bremser AI-crawlere (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot m.fl.) og skader din AI-synlighed. Google ignorerer den alligevel; fjern linjen.
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
60
- Flere Organization-noder på samme side (2 stk.) — typisk dit SEO-plugins og en andens. Slå dem sammen til ét @graph, så AI-parsere ikke skal vælge mellem dubletter.
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
70
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- Meta description length: 187 characters (optimal: 25-160)
💬 Content Citability
65
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 1/25 headings are questions (4%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
100
No issues found ✓
🔒 Security
85
- Missing Strict-Transport-Security header (HSTS) — recommended for AI crawlers
⚡ Performance
85
- INP 271ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms — og STIGENDE fra 475ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
100
No issues found ✓
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
75
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
🔢 Empirical Content Data
65
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 5 af 113 sætninger indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (1 sætning forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →