GEO report · public sharing
majestic.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
82.4
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
89/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
82/100
Grade B
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Din robots.txt har en 'Crawl-delay'-linje — den bremser AI-crawlere (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot m.fl.) og skader din AI-synlighed. Google ignorerer den alligevel; fjern linjen.
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
100
- llms.txt follows the llmstxt.org spec ✓
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
75
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
73
- 3 H1 headings — recommend only one per page
- Manglende Open Graph / Social Sharing tags — AI-crawlere (Perplexity, ChatGPT plugins) bruger og:title og og:description til entitetsgenkendelse og uddrag. Mangler: Mangler og:title meta-tag, Mangler og:description meta-tag, Mangler og:image meta-tag
💬 Content Citability
65
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 2/36 headings are questions (6%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
85
- No LinkedIn link on the website
🔒 Security
90
- Missing X-Frame-Options header
⚡ Performance
85
- LCP 2848ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms — på vej ned fra 2783ms over 25 uger, så det virker
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
62
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
65
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
65
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 3 af 53 sætninger indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (1 sætning forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →