GEO report · public sharing
semrush.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-02 · Back to the benchmark
68.5
/100
Grade: D
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
73/100
Grade C
Your AI visibility
69/100
Grade D
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Din robots.txt har en 'Crawl-delay'-linje — den bremser AI-crawlere (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot m.fl.) og skader din AI-synlighed. Google ignorerer den alligevel; fjern linjen.
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
100
- llms.txt follows the llmstxt.org spec ✓
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
70
- No H1 heading found — H1 is critical for AI entity recognition
💬 Content Citability
35
- Low factual density — AI more often cites pages with numbers, prices, years
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- No H2/H3 headings found — hard for AI to extract structure
- No tables or lists — structured content improves AI extraction
🏷️ Brand Entity
100
No issues found ✓
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
85
- INP 409ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms — og STIGENDE fra 391ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 33 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
20
- Only 0 internal links — recommend 5+ for AI crawlability
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
0
- Weak E-E-A-T profile — AI search engines rate trustworthiness as low
- Few trust signals — add author bios, certifications, case studies
🎯 Platform Optimization
65
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Few question-answer patterns — AI often cites direct answers
- Only 0/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
65
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
65
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 0 af 1 sætning indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →