GEO report · public sharing
seranking.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-02 · Back to the benchmark
77.2
/100
Grade: C
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
81/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
72/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
80
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
💬 Content Citability
65
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 0/31 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
80
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
🔒 Security
85
- Missing Strict-Transport-Security header (HSTS) — recommended for AI crawlers
⚡ Performance
70
- CLS 0.16 (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for høj; Googles grænse er 0.1 — og STIGENDE fra 0.02 over 25 uger
- INP 205ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms — og STIGENDE fra 230ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 439 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
75
No issues found ✓
🎯 Platform Optimization
100
No issues found ✓
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
65
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
67
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (4 af 45 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (1 sætning forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →