GEO report · public sharing
orsted.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-09 · Back to the benchmark
78.8
/100
Grade: C
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
83/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
71/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
66
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- Meta description length: 161 characters (optimal: 25-160)
- Manglende Open Graph / Social Sharing tags — AI-crawlere (Perplexity, ChatGPT plugins) bruger og:title og og:description til entitetsgenkendelse og uddrag. Mangler: Mangler og:description meta-tag
💬 Content Citability
65
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 0/9 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
100
No issues found ✓
🔒 Security
100
No issues found ✓
⚡ Performance
70
- INP 230ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms
- LCP 2667ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
62
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
80
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
55
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
- No sameAs in Organization schema — list social platforms
🔢 Empirical Content Data
100
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →