GEO report · public sharing
dnb.no
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-09 · Back to the benchmark
71.3
/100
Grade: C
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
85/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
65/100
Grade D
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- No sitemap.xml found — helps search engines and AI crawlers discover all your pages
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
25
- Mangler H1 (# Titel) — påkrævet af llmstxt.org spec
- Mangler blockquote (>) — anbefalet til AI-kontekst
- Ingen H2-sektioner — anbefal mindst én
- Ingen links — llms.txt bør have URL-referencer
📊 Structured Data
0
- No JSON-LD structured data found
📝 Basic Page Signals
96
- Manglende Open Graph / Social Sharing tags — AI-crawlere (Perplexity, ChatGPT plugins) bruger og:title og og:description til entitetsgenkendelse og uddrag. Mangler: Mangler twitter:card/twitter:title meta-tags
💬 Content Citability
85
- Only 0/10 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
85
- No LinkedIn link on the website
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
85
- INP 248ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
12
- Weak E-E-A-T profile — AI search engines rate trustworthiness as low
- Few trust signals — add author bios, certifications, case studies
🎯 Platform Optimization
65
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Few question-answer patterns — AI often cites direct answers
- Only 0/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
30
- Missing Organization/LocalBusiness schema — most important for AI entity recognition
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
80
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →