GEO report · public sharing
sistrix.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-02 · Back to the benchmark
75.2
/100
Grade: C
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
A solid foundation, but there are several areas that could be improved to increase the likelihood of AI citations. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
84/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
67/100
Grade D
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
75
No issues found ✓
📝 Basic Page Signals
55
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- Title length: 72 characters (optimal: 10-70)
- No meta description found — used as a page summary in search results and by AI
💬 Content Citability
65
- BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) missing — the key point should appear in the first 60 words
- Only 0/5 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
65
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
- No LinkedIn link on the website
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
85
- LCP 2992ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms — på vej ned fra 3456ms over 25 uger, så det virker
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 12 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
50
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
80
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- No sameAs in Organization schema — list social platforms
🔢 Empirical Content Data
48
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 1 af 47 sætninger indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- 1 sætning med vagt superlativ-sprog uden belæg. Overvej at tilføje konkrete tal som understøttelse
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →