GEO report · public sharing
fortum.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-09 · Back to the benchmark
80.7
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
88/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
74/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
- Dit sitemap serveres som 'ukendt type' i stedet for 'application/xml' — flere crawlere parser det ikke pålideligt. Serve /sitemap.xml med Content-Type: application/xml.
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
65
No issues found ✓
📝 Basic Page Signals
70
- Heading hierarchy skips levels (e.g. H2→H4)
- Meta description length: 302 characters (optimal: 25-160)
💬 Content Citability
75
- Only 0/11 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
- Few highlighted key terms — bold text guides AI attention
🏷️ Brand Entity
100
No issues found ✓
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
100
No issues found ✓
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 191 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
62
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
80
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
70
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
- No sameAs in Organization schema — list social platforms
🔢 Empirical Content Data
67
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (2 af 22 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →