GEO report · public sharing
upm.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-09 · Back to the benchmark
64.1
/100
Grade: D
Average — AI search engines can read parts of the site, but important signals are missing. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Average — AI search engines can read parts of the site, but important signals are missing. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
68/100
Grade D
Your AI visibility
59/100
Grade F
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
70
- No H1 heading found — H1 is critical for AI entity recognition
💬 Content Citability
55
- Low factual density — AI more often cites pages with numbers, prices, years
- No H2/H3 headings found — hard for AI to extract structure
- No tables or lists — structured content improves AI extraction
- Few highlighted key terms — bold text guides AI attention
🏷️ Brand Entity
80
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
58
- CLS 0.91 (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for høj; Googles grænse er 0.1 — og STIGENDE fra 0.34 over 25 uger
- LCP 2996ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms — på vej ned fra 3161ms over 25 uger, så det virker
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 149 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
20
- Only 0 internal links — recommend 5+ for AI crawlability
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
12
- Weak E-E-A-T profile — AI search engines rate trustworthiness as low
- Few trust signals — add author bios, certifications, case studies
🎯 Platform Optimization
65
- Ingen FAQ-/spørgsmålssektion fundet på forsiden — de citerede sider besvarer typisk kundernes spørgsmål direkte i teksten
- Few question-answer patterns — AI often cites direct answers
- Only 0/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
65
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
55
- Lav empirisk tæthed: kun 0 af 2 sætninger indeholder konkrete tal, procenter eller kvantificerede resultater. At tilføje statistikker var blandt de mest effektive ændringer i KDD'24-studiet (30-40 % på studiets primære synlighedsmål)
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
- Ingen ekstern kildehenvisning fundet. Citater fra analysefirmaer eller branchestudier øger AI's tillid markant
- Lav teknisk forklaringsdybde (0 sætninger forklarer mekanismen bag jeres løsning). AI prioriterer indhold der forklarer HVORDAN frem for HVAD ('vi bruger RAG + vektor-søgning til ...')
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →