GEO report · public sharing
ahrefs.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-10 · Back to the benchmark
82.4
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
88/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
75/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
100
No issues found ✓
💬 Content Citability
75
- Only 0/43 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
- Few highlighted key terms — bold text guides AI attention
🏷️ Brand Entity
80
- No Wikipedia page — a strong signal for AI authority
🔒 Security
90
- Missing X-Frame-Options header
⚡ Performance
85
- INP 464ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms — og STIGENDE fra 385ms over 25 uger
📱 Mobile Adaptation
85
- 381 fixed pixel widths found — use responsive units (%, rem)
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
88
No issues found ✓
🎯 Platform Optimization
100
No issues found ✓
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
65
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
🔢 Empirical Content Data
80
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (5 af 73 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- 1 sætning med vagt superlativ-sprog uden belæg. Overvej at tilføje konkrete tal som understøttelse
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →