GEO report · public sharing
yara.com
Technical AI readiness measured using Geoa’s free GEO-test — 15 dimensions that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity can read, understand and quote the site.
Last scanned: 2026-10-09 · Back to the benchmark
80.8
/100
Grade: B
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Strong technical AI readiness — the site is easy for AI search engines to read and cite. Dimensions marked ‘not measured’ are treated as neutral, typically because the site blocks automatic measurements.
Your Google visibility
87/100
Grade B
Your AI visibility
74/100
Grade C
The 15 dimensions
🤖 AI Crawler Accessibility
100
No issues found ✓
🖥️ Server-Side Rendering
100
- Content appears in HTML — SSR friendly ✓
📄 llms.txt
0
- No /llms.txt found — strongly recommended for AI visibility. Call POST /llms-txt/generate/{customer_id} to generate one automatically.
- Ingen /llms-full.txt — anbefalet supplement til llms.txt med fuld sideindholdsindeks. llms-full.txt øger citering på Claude og ChatGPT ved at give dem adgang til komplet kontekst.
📊 Structured Data
50
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
📝 Basic Page Signals
100
No issues found ✓
💬 Content Citability
85
- Only 0/7 headings are questions (0%) — recommend 10%+
🏷️ Brand Entity
100
No issues found ✓
🔒 Security
100
- Security-headers kunne ikke måles (HTTP 301, bot-beskyttelse) — ikke medregnet
⚡ Performance
55
- CLS 0.13 (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for høj; Googles grænse er 0.1
- INP 282ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 200ms
- LCP 3513ms (denne side, rigtige brugere) — for langsom; Googles grænse er 2500ms
📱 Mobile Adaptation
100
No issues found ✓
🔗 Internal Links
100
No issues found ✓
⭐ E-E-A-T Content Quality
50
- Moderate E-E-A-T — room for improvement in several categories
🎯 Platform Optimization
90
- Only 1/2 community validation signals found — recommend Trustpilot, G2, case studies or LinkedIn
🗂️ Schema Recommendations
55
- Missing WebSite schema — helps AI identify the website's role
- Missing FAQPage schema — FAQs are frequently cited in AI answers
- Missing BreadcrumbList schema — structures the page path for AI
- No sameAs in Organization schema — list social platforms
🔢 Empirical Content Data
87
- Moderat empirisk tæthed (12 af 133 sætninger med konkrete tal). Mål: mindst 1 empirisk udsagn per ~8 sætninger
- Intet konkret case-resultat fundet (fx 'sagsbehandlingstid fra 3 uger til 4 dage'). Kundehistorier med målbare resultater er stærkt citerbart indhold — brug kun tal, I selv har målt, og skriv gerne hvornår
How does your website score?
Same engine, same 15 dimensions — run Geoa’s free GEO-test on your own domain and get a report like this in under a minute.
Run the free AI Visibility Checker →